Limited public previews adapted from the Academy’s curriculum and operations materials. These samples illustrate the structure of the work; they are not completed client deliverables, empirical findings, or a full curriculum release.
01 / PLAN
A sample annual training pathway
Excerpt from the revised twelve-course annual selection. Exact dates, policies, priorities, and supervisor actions are customized to the facility. This is a planning example, not an annual compliance certification.
Month
Selected course
Scheduled time
Illustrative reinforcement
1
Module 21: Child & Adolescent Development
120 minutes
Review how expectations fit a youth’s developmental needs.
2
Module 23: SOGIE-Affirming Residential Care
120 minutes
Reinforce respectful language and the facility’s relevant procedures.
3
Module 13: California Integrated Core Practice Model
120 minutes
Observe an agreed engagement or teaming practice.
8
Module 16: Documentation That Matters
120 minutes
Apply the agreed rubric to an authorized, deidentified note sample.
9
Module 18: Workforce Resilience
120 minutes
Follow up on one staff-support or workload action.
10
Module 20: High-Performing Residential Teams
120 minutes
Review handoff completeness and action ownership.
Six selected months are shown. The annual partnership contains twelve selected courses and 24 scheduled course hours. Onboarding occurs before Month 1; supervisor meetings and leadership reviews are tracked separately.
02 / PRACTICE
Documentation: observation before interpretation
Adapted learning excerpt from Module 16, Documentation That Matters. The example below is fictional. Practice fields are temporary and are not submitted or stored by the website.
Fictional learning example
A draft note says: “He had a good day.” The available observations are: he attended school, completed the evening chore after one prompt, and participated in recreation for 45 minutes.
Follow facility documentation procedures. This educational activity does not replace required reports, clinical judgment, or authorized record systems.
03 / DOCUMENT
Keep participation and application visible
Unpopulated field excerpts adapted from the Academy’s operations forms. Attendance, demonstrated learning, and workplace application are distinct records.
Course completion record
Event ID, course title, and version
Participant identifier and training date
Arrival, departure, breaks, and net attendance
Knowledge-check and applied-demonstration results
Completion status and reassessment, if needed
Certificate ID, issuance, and correction history
Supervisor follow-up record
Agreed skill or practice commitment
Date, setting, and observed evidence
Independent, prompted, or further practice needed
Coaching action and responsible person
Due date and follow-up evidence
Supervisor review and sign-off
Individual results are handled through the agreed record process. Leadership reporting uses appropriate aggregates. A completion record does not itself confer professional CE, administrator CE, or an independent credential.
04 / REVIEW
A sample leadership report structure
Unpopulated reporting outline adapted from the implementation handbook. No outcome values have been invented.
1. Scope and participation
Reporting period; sites and cohorts; courses delivered; unique learners; participant-session completions; expected and actual completions.
2. Learning and practice evidence
Knowledge and demonstration results; actual attended hours; initial and reassessment results separately.
Agreed practice measures: documentation quality, complete handoffs, and supervisor follow-up, where included in scope.
Authorized sampled notes meeting the agreed rubric ÷ notes sampled
Rubric, sample size, period, and limitations
Handoff completeness
Sampled handoffs meeting the agreed criteria ÷ handoffs sampled
Criteria, observation method, and sample size
Action follow-through
Actions closed by due date ÷ actions due
Owner, due date, and evidence of closure
3. Leadership decisions and next steps
Open barriers, resource needs, assigned actions, recommended adjustments, and next review date.
Baseline and follow-up comparisons identify missing data and contextual changes. Satisfaction and observed practice are reported separately; broader youth or retention outcomes are not attributed to training without supporting evidence.